Right to Refuse Enhancement

Definition

Right to Refuse Enhancement examines protection against direct or indirect coercion to adopt cognitive technologies within the broader domain of the rights and safeguards protecting freedom of thought, cognitive self-determination and freedom from unwanted interference.

Why this matters

Failures concerning protection against direct or indirect coercion to adopt cognitive technologies can cause physical or psychological harm, loss of function, privacy invasion, identity compromise, exclusion, coercion or irreversible impact on human agency.

Research questions

Under which conditions can protection against direct or indirect coercion to adopt cognitive technologies be delivered, measured or protected reliably, and how do outcomes vary by person, device, duration, context and governance controls?

Hypotheses

A transparent, safety-bounded and person-centred approach to right to refuse enhancement, combining validated measurement, informed consent, privacy and security controls, human oversight and longitudinal monitoring, will improve benefit–risk outcomes compared with opaque or technology-centred approaches.

Proposed methods

rights analysis; scenario-based user studies; informed-consent testing; coercion and manipulation assessment; legal comparison; participatory research; ethics review; expert and affected-user review; reproducibility testing; methods adapted specifically to Right to Refuse Enhancement

Stakeholders and beneficiaries

individuals; patients; workers; students; clinicians; employers; governments; human-rights bodies; technology providers; legal practitioners