Tech4Humanity AtlasGround ZeroCurrent ThemesFuture ResearchGalleryLive Q&ASearch

Biological & Neural Integrity / Cognitive Liberty

SUB-T05-024

Protection of Inner Speech

Definition

Protection of Inner Speech examines safeguards against decoding, inference or disclosure of covert speech and internal language within the broader domain of the rights and safeguards protecting freedom of thought, cognitive self-determination and freedom from unwanted interference.

Why this matters

Failures concerning safeguards against decoding, inference or disclosure of covert speech and internal language can cause physical or psychological harm, loss of function, privacy invasion, identity compromise, exclusion, coercion or irreversible impact on human agency.

Research questions

Under which conditions can safeguards against decoding, inference or disclosure of covert speech and internal language be delivered, measured or protected reliably, and how do outcomes vary by person, device, duration, context and governance controls?

Hypotheses

A transparent, safety-bounded and person-centred approach to protection of inner speech, combining validated measurement, informed consent, privacy and security controls, human oversight and longitudinal monitoring, will improve benefit–risk outcomes compared with opaque or technology-centred approaches.

Proposed methods

rights analysis; scenario-based user studies; informed-consent testing; coercion and manipulation assessment; legal comparison; participatory research; ethics review; expert and affected-user review; reproducibility testing; methods adapted specifically to Protection of Inner Speech

Stakeholders and beneficiaries

individuals; patients; workers; students; clinicians; employers; governments; human-rights bodies; technology providers; legal practitioners