Institutional Safety, Governance & Trust / Audit and Evidence
SUB-T06-010Audit Trails
Definition
Audit Trails is the systematic design and evaluation of audit trails within the creation, preservation and verification of evidence showing what systems, people and institutions did.
Why this matters
Weak audit trails can lead to unsafe deployment, unlawful or unauthorised action, wasted public resources, loss of rights, poor accountability and declining institutional trust.
Research questions
Which controls, evidence and institutional arrangements make audit trails effective in practice, and how do outcomes vary by sector, system risk, organisational maturity and operating context?
Hypotheses
An explicit, testable and continuously evidenced approach to audit trails, with clear ownership, independent review, runtime telemetry and recovery, will outperform policy-only or periodic compliance approaches.
Proposed methods
provenance analysis; audit-log testing; receipt reconciliation; replay testing; evidence completeness assessment; forensic review; stakeholder interviews; document and control review; fault and incident simulation; longitudinal implementation assessment; methods adapted specifically to Audit Trails
Stakeholders and beneficiaries
citizens; public servants; executives; boards; regulators; auditors; legal and risk teams; technology teams; service users; civil society; suppliers