Mental State Privacy
Mental State Privacy examines protection of inferred attention, emotion, intention, fatigue and other mental states within the broader domain of the privacy, ownership, inference,
Failures concerning protection of inferred attention, emotion, intention, fatigue and other mental states can cause physical or psychological harm, loss of function, privacy invasion, identity compromise, exclusion, coercion or irreversible impact on human agency.
8 canonical Subtopics in this Topic.
Mental State Privacy examines protection of inferred attention, emotion, intention, fatigue and other mental states within the broader domain of the privacy, ownership, inference,
Neural Data Ownership examines rights and responsibilities concerning control, transfer and commercial use of neural data within the broader domain of the privacy, ownership, infer
Neural Data Consent examines specific, informed and revocable consent for neural collection, inference and secondary use within the broader domain of the privacy, ownership, infere
Inference from Neural Signals examines limits and validity of conclusions drawn from neural data beyond the original purpose within the broader domain of the privacy, ownership, in
Neural Surveillance examines detection and prevention of covert or coercive monitoring through neural technologies within the broader domain of the privacy, ownership, inference, r
Neural Data Retention examines proportionate storage periods, deletion and lifecycle control for neural records within the broader domain of the privacy, ownership, inference, rete
Neural Data Security examines confidentiality, integrity and availability of neural signals, models and derived profiles within the broader domain of the privacy, ownership, infere
Right to Mental Opacity examines a protected ability not to reveal or have inferred inner mental states within the broader domain of the privacy, ownership, inference, retention an
Scenario narratives — not empirical findings.
The first customer did not ask Jacob for more features. They asked what would happen when the system was wrong. Emerging biological and neural technologies create a material need to understand and govern protection of in
Read the full story →At the remote site, a plausible alert could stop production, while a missed alert could put a life at risk. Emerging biological and neural technologies create a material need to understand and govern rights and responsib
Read the full story →The system crossed the border in a day. Its assumptions about language, authority and trust did not travel nearly as well. Emerging biological and neural technologies create a material need to understand and govern speci
Read the full story →The project began properly only when the community asked who had defined the problem, who would hold the data and who could stop the work. Emerging biological and neural technologies create a material need to understand
Read the full story →Day 19, 16:40. Eli wrote one sentence in the margin of the protocol: “The improvement may not belong to the intervention.” Emerging biological and neural technologies create a material need to understand and govern detec
Read the full story →The exercise began with a simulated outage and became a test of whether people could still coordinate when the dashboards disappeared. Emerging biological and neural technologies create a material need to understand and
Read the full story →The briefing room was full, but the first slide contained only one question: who carries the consequence if this fails? Emerging biological and neural technologies create a material need to understand and govern confiden
Read the full story →The prototype impressed every investor in the room. The unanswered question on the whiteboard was whether it improved a human outcome. Emerging biological and neural technologies create a material need to understand and
Read the full story →