Biological & Neural Integrity / Neural Privacy
SUB-T05-014Neural Data Retention
Definition
Neural Data Retention examines proportionate storage periods, deletion and lifecycle control for neural records within the broader domain of the privacy, ownership, inference, retention and protection of neural and mental-state data.
Why this matters
Failures concerning proportionate storage periods, deletion and lifecycle control for neural records can cause physical or psychological harm, loss of function, privacy invasion, identity compromise, exclusion, coercion or irreversible impact on human agency.
Research questions
Under which conditions can proportionate storage periods, deletion and lifecycle control for neural records be delivered, measured or protected reliably, and how do outcomes vary by person, device, duration, context and governance controls?
Hypotheses
A transparent, safety-bounded and person-centred approach to neural data retention, combining validated measurement, informed consent, privacy and security controls, human oversight and longitudinal monitoring, will improve benefit–risk outcomes compared with opaque or technology-centred approaches.
Proposed methods
privacy threat modelling; neural inference testing; consent comprehension studies; data-flow mapping; security assessment; policy analysis; user-rights evaluation; expert and affected-user review; reproducibility testing; methods adapted specifically to Neural Data Retention
Stakeholders and beneficiaries
neurotechnology users; patients; researchers; clinicians; privacy regulators; device manufacturers; employers; insurers; civil society